Canadian Psychiatric Association

Editorial Credits/ Crédits éditorials

Subscription Rates /Prix d'abonnements

Advertising Rates / Tarifs publicitaires (PDF)


Editorial
In This Issue
Quentin Rae-Grant
(PDF)


Original Research
Quality of Life in OCD: Differential Impact of Obsessions, Compulsions, and Depression Comorbidity

Mario Masellis, Neil A Rector, Margaret A Richter

(PDF)

A Pilot Study of a Parent-Education Group for Families Affected by Depression
Mark Sanford, Carolyn Byrne, Susan Williams, Sandy Atley, Ted Ridley, Jennifer Miller, Heather Allin

(PDF)

Differentiating Symptoms of Complicated Grief and Depression Among Psychiatric Outpatients
John S Ogrodniczuk, William E Piper, Anthony S Joyce, Rene Weideman, Mary McCallum, Hassan F Azim, John S Rosie

(PDF)

Filicidal Women: Jail or Psychiatric Ward?
Line Laporte, Bernard Poulin, Jacques Marleau, Renée Roy, Thierry Webanck

(PDF)

Phenomenology and Comorbidity of Dysthymic Disorder in 100 Consecutively Referred Children and Adolescents: Beyond DSM-IV
Gabriele Masi, Stefania Millepiedi, Maria Mucci, Rosa Rita Pascale, Giulio Perugi, Hagop S Akiskal

(PDF)

A Multicentre Prospective Controlled Study to Determine the Safety of Trazodone and Nefazodone Use During Pregnancy
Adrienne Einarson, Lori Bonari, Sharon Voyer-Lavigne, Antonio Addis, Doreen Matsui, Yvette Johnson, Gideon Koren

(PDF)


Brief Communication
Clozapine Treatment in Patients With Prior Substance Abuse

Deanna L Kelly, Elizabeth A Gale, Robert R Conley

(PDF)

The Effect of Peer Support on Postpartum Depression: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Cindy-Lee Dennis

(PDF)


Book Reviews
(PDF)

Psychological Aspects of Women’s Health Care: The Interface Between Psychiatry and Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2nd Edition.
Reviewed by
Vera Lantos, MD, FRCPC

Introduction to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Principles and Techniques.
Reviewed by
Jimmy Jensen, PhD,
Shitij Kapur, MD, FRCPC, PhD

Planification et évaluation des besoins en santé mentale.
Revue par
Raymond Tempier, MD

Clinical Interaction and the Analysis of Meaning: A New Psychoanalytic Theory.
Reviewed by
Paul Ian Steinberg, MD, FRCPC

Evidence and Experience in Psychiatry. Volume 2: Schizophrenia.
Reviewed by
Mary V Seeman, MD

Schizophrenia Revealed: From Neurons to Social Interactions.
Reviewed by
Emmanuel Stip, MD

How’s Your Marriage? A Book for Men and Women.
Reviewed by
Karl M Tomm, MD FRCPC,
Cynthia A Beck, MD MASc FRCPC

L’extermination des malades mentaux dans l’allemagne nazie.
Revue par
Frédéric Grunberg, MD

Physicalism and Its Discontents.
Reviewed by
Dorian Deshauer, MD FRCP


Letters to the Editor
(PDF)

Zenker’s Diverticulum and Psychosis in the Elderly

Anorgasmia and Withdrawal Syndrome in a Woman Taking Gabapentin

Stage-Oriented Trauma Treatment Using Dialectical Behaviour Therapy

Sexual Sadism With Lust-Murder Proclivities in a Female?

Topiramate-Induced Suicidality

Bright-Light Therapy in Somatization Disorder

Venlafaxine-Induced Delirium

New Dosage-Reduction Regime to Avoid Paroxetine Discontinuation Syndrome

Risperidone-Induced Galactorrhoea: A Case Series

Gamma Hydroxybutyrate Withdrawal in an Orthopedic Trauma Patient

Version française de la Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS)

Brief Communication

The Effect of Peer Support on Postpartum Depression: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Cindy-Lee Dennis, RN, PhD1

 

Objective: To evaluate the effect of peer support (mother-to-mother) on depressive symptomatology among mothers identified as high-risk for postpartum depression (PPD).

Method: Forty-two mothers in British Columbia were identified as high-risk for PPD according to the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and randomly assigned to either a control group (that is, to standard community postpartum care) or an experimental group. The experimental group received standard care plus telephone-based peer support, initiated within 48 to 72 hours of randomization, from a mother who previously experienced PPD and attended a 4-hour training session. Research assistants blind to group allocation conducted follow-up assessments on diverse outcomes, including depressive symptomatology, at 4 and 8 weeks postrandomization.

Results: Significant group differences were found in probable major depressive symptom- atology (EPDS > 12) at the 4-week (c2 = 5.18, df = 1; P = 0.02) and 8-week (c2 = 6.37, df = 1; P = 0.01) assessments. Specifically, at the 4-week assessment 40.9% (n = 9) of mothers in the control group scored > 12 on the EPDS, compared with only 10% ( = 2) in the experimental group. Similar findings were found at the 8-week assessment, when 52.4% ( = 11) of mothers in the control group scored > 12 on the EPDS, compared with 15% (n = 3) of mothers in the experimental group. Of the 16 mothers in the experimental group who evaluated the intervention, 87.5% were satisfied with their peer-support experience.

Conclusions: Telephone-based peer support may effectively decrease depressive symptomatology among new mothers. The high maternal satisfaction with, and acceptance of, the intervention suggests that a larger trial is feasible.

(Can J Psychiatry 2003;48:115–124)

Click here for author affiliations.

Click here for research funding and support.

Clinical Implications

  • If researched further, telephone-based peer support may be a beneficial postpartum depression (PPD) treatment, used in collaboration with professional health care services.

  • This pilot trial demonstrated the feasibility of implementing and evaluating a PPD peer-support program.

  • New mothers are receptive to telephone-based support interventions.

Limitations

  • A larger randomized controlled trial is required.

  • Evaluation of outcome data was limited to self-report.

  • There was insufficient power to detect group differences related to secondary outcomes.


Key Words
: pilot test, randomized controlled trial, postpartum depression, peer support, social support

Résumé : L’effet du soutien des pairs sur la dépression du post-partum : une étude pilote randomisée et contrôlée

Childbirth represents for women a time of great vulnerability to becoming mentally unwell, with postpartum mood disorders representing the most frequent form of maternal morbidity following delivery (1). In general, women who experience these conditions form 2 subgroups: those who have been mentally well prior to pregnancy; and those who are already suffering or have suffered from a psychiatric illness, which predisposes them more in the postpartum period. Affective disorders following childbirth range in severity from the early “maternity blues” to postpartum psychosis, a serious state affecting less than 1% of mothers and usually requiring hospitalization (2). Along this spectrum is postpartum depression (PPD), classified in the DSM-IV as a depressive condition that often exhibits the disabling symptoms of dysphoria, emotional lability, insomnia, confusion, anxiety, guilt, and suicidal ideation (3). Frequently exacerbating these indicators are low self-esteem, inability to cope, negative maternal attitudes, and loneliness (4–7). The inception rate is greatest in the first 12 weeks postpartum (8), with duration frequently depending on symptom severity (9) and delay in adequate treatment (10). Residual depressive symptoms are common (11,12), and 50% of mothers will remain clinically depressed at 6 months (13,14). An estimated 25% of women with untreated PPD will experience clinical depression that continues past the first year postpartum (15,16).

Unfortunately, PPD is a major health issue for many women. Longitudinal and epidemiologic studies have yielded varying prevalence rates, ranging from 3% to more than 25% of women in the first year after delivery. These rates fluctuate owing to sample size, timing of assessment, differing diagnostic criteria (that is, major or minor depression), and whether the studies were retrospective (yielding low rates) or prospective (yielding rates that are higher by six- to tenfold). A metaanalysis of 59 studies reported the overall prevalence of major PPD to be 13% (17); the absolute difference in estimates between self-report assessments and diagnostic interviews was small. While national Canadian statistics are unknown, a longitudinal study of 645 British Columbia (BC) mothers has just been completed by Dennis (unpublished data). Measured according to the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) (18), the prevalence of probable major PPD at 4 and 8 weeks postpartum was found to be 9.1% and 8%, respectively, while the corresponding occurrence of probable minor PPD was an additional 13.5% and 12.6%.

This hidden morbidity has well-documented health consequences for the mother, child, and family. While women who have suffered from PPD are twice as likely to experience future episodes of depression over a 5-year period (19), infants and children are particularly vulnerable. Mediated through impaired maternal infant interactions (20,21) and negative perceptions of infant behaviour (22,23), PPD has been linked to various adverse outcomes, including attachment insecurity (24–26), emotional developmental delay (24,27), social interaction difficulties (28,29), and development of psychopathology (30). Infants as young as age 3 months have been shown to ably detect the affective quality displayed by their mothers and to modify their own responses accordingly (31–33). While cognitive skills (34), expressive language development (35), and attention (36) have been negatively affected by PPD, it has also been reported that children of mothers suffering from depression are 2 to 5 times more likely to develop long-term behavioural problems (37–39). Child neglect or abuse (40) and marital stress resulting in separation or divorce (41,42) are other reported outcomes. Highlighted recently in the media, maternal and infant mortality is a rare but real consequence of PPD.

The etiology of PPD remains unclear (11,12). Despite considerable research (43), no single causative factor has been isolated, suggesting a multifactorial cause. However, epidemiologic investigations and comprehensive meta-analyses of predictive studies have consistently implied the importance of psychosocial variables (12,17,44,45). Precipitators that significantly increase the risk of PPD include life stress (17,44,46,47), child-care stress (44,47–49), marital conflict (7,44,46–48), low maternal self-esteem (7,44), and lack of social support (5,7,8,17,44,47,50). Moreover, 2 metaanalyses propose a further risk of PPD among socially disadvantaged women (17,44).

Health professionals have developed diverse psychosocial interventions congruent with the PPD vulnerability-stress model (47). Randomized controlled trials evaluating cognitive-behavioural counselling with antidepressants (51), cognitive-behavioural therapy and nondirective counselling (52), health visitor led nondirective counselling (53,54), and nurse-facilitated support groups (55) have all demonstrated the amenability of PPD to professional treatment (56). However, a growing trend in health care, and in postpartum care particularly, is the use of lay support. In predictive studies, detailed analyses of support variables suggest that the following social deficiencies significantly increase the risk of PPD: not having someone to talk openly with who has shared and understood a similar problem (50), not having an intimate confidante or friend to converse with (50,57–59), not receiving support without asking (50), and feeling socially isolated (7). Conversely, companionship and belonging to a group of similar others had a protective effect (60). When women were asked for their own explanations as to why they experienced PPD, they commonly responded with “lack of support” and “feeling isolated.” When asked what advice they would give to new mothers currently suffering from PPD, the foremost suggestion proffered was “find someone to talk to” (61). In a recent BC longitudinal study, maternal mood was significantly correlated with perceived support from other women with children (Dennis, unpublished data). Similarly, 6 focus groups conducted with BC mothers who suffered from PPD further validated the saliency of support from other mothers (62). These results suggest that support provided by an experienced mother may be a simple intervention to address PPD and its unfavourable effects on mothers and infants. However, no study evaluating the effect of peer support on PPD symptomatology was found. Therefore, this pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of mother-to-mother support on depressive symptomatology among new mothers and determined the feasibility of conducting a larger trial. It was hypothesized that new mothers who received telephone-based support from women who previously experienced PPD would have decreased depressive symptomatology, compared with mothers who did not receive the supportive intervention.

Methods

Participants
Participants were recruited from a health region near Vancouver, British Columbia, between May 1, 2001, and October 31, 2001. Mothers were identified through region-wide screening at the 8-week immunization clinics managed by public health nurses. Eligible participants were all new mothers between 8 and 12 weeks postpartum who were aged at least 18 years, were able to speak English, had a singleton birth at 37 weeks’ gestation or more, scored > 9 on the EPDS, resided in the surrounding region, and were accessible by a local telephone call. Exclusion criteria included current use of antidepressant medications; a history of psychotherapy during the previous 12-month period; and a history of chronic depression, psychiatric clinical disorder, or postpartum psychosis.

Design Overview
A pilot randomized controlled trial (Figure 1) was conducted, using a previously conducted peer-support trial as a framework (63). After completing informed-consent procedures approved by the University of British Columbia ethics committee, as well as a baseline questionnaire, mothers were randomized to either a control or an experimental group. Randomization was achieved by using consecutively numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes containing randomly generated numbers. This procedure was constructed by a research assistant who was not involved in the recruitment process. Women allocated to the control group had access to the standard community postpartum services. Women allocated to the experimental group also had access to all the standard services, in addition to being paired with a peer volunteer. Research assistants blind to group allocation telephoned all participants at 4 weeks postrandomization to assess depressive symptomatology, and again at 8 weeks post- randomization to assess all outcome data. At the end of the 2-month follow-up, mothers in the experimental group answered questions regarding their peer-support experience.

Figure 1 Trial schema

fig1dennis.JPG - 33312 Bytes


1 | 2 | 3 | 4



CJP Archives in English | Archives RCP en français
Supplements and Position Paper Inserts |
Lignes directrices cliniques, énoncés de principe et communiqués
Author Index to 2002 | Index RCP des auteurs 2002
Subject Index to 2002 | Index RCP des sujets 2002
Information for Contributors | Information à l'intention des auteurs
Style Notes for Contributors
Subscription Rates | Prix d'abonnements
Advertising Rates | Tarifs publicitaires
CPA Home | Page d'accueil